|
Post by garry on Mar 5, 2022 8:41:47 GMT
Why does he want a buffer zone? Because he doesn’t want what he sees as hostile and expansionist forces camped on his border. NATO started as 8 countries, its now 30. Most of that growth coming from Eastern Europe. It’s hard to argue that it’s not expansionist. And if Ukraine can join NATO can Cuba establish a military alliance with Russia?w Yes, Cuba can - but would it be along the lines of NATO? Putin sees NATO as as hostile and expansionist but in reality its expansion is by countries that were subjugated by Moscow for half a century+. They made the choice to join NATO not for aggression but to protect themselves from the horrors and restrictions they had already experienced. NATO does not tell each nation state how to behave but offers a guarantee of joint action to protect - something done to avoid a divided internal European war. Putin doesn't like NATO not because it is expansionist and aggressive but because it prevents Russian domination of its neighbour states, who (I'll repeat) have independence from one another and both Russia and the USA.* The Warsaw Pact era was nothing like that: you did what the Kremlin said or were imprisoned or shot and so were your family and associates. This is why attempting to blame the NATO expansion as the cause of Putin's aggression riles many: it's an excuse to grab very fertile and ore-rich lands for Moscow's benefit not for the befit of the local nation or the wider market. *Even the EU states have independence from one another and EU wide rules and directives are only enacted after representatives from ALL member states have ratified them. This independence was clearly demonstrated by the individual rules applied by states during COVID. Last time they tried there was that little problem called the Cuban missile crisis.
|
|
|
Post by Big Blue on Mar 5, 2022 9:08:54 GMT
Last time they tried there was that little problem called the Cuban missile crisis. You told me earlier that my 12 year timeline between Budapest and Czechoslovakia was taking poetic license and now this The Warsaw Pact was NOT like an alliance: it was control by Moscow. Forcible control and the installation of a puppet government. Like Ukraine would be if Putin has his way. I agree (as I did earlier) that Putin is not our version of Hitler - he is geographically but not in political terms. Geography shows that Rusyn tribes spread across Russia and the Ukraine but the Polaks were different and controlled a lot of Ukraine through war-gains. Hitler the same: German speaking in Czech, Poland, Slovakia (which didn't exist really) Hungary, Austria (still) was from the Germanic tribes that were indigenous there. So they are geographically the same. Politically: Hitler came to power from a background of a Germany perceived as militarily and industrially castrated by the Treaty of Versailles, thrust upon the German people by the victors of war. Putin is coming from a wealthy state with vast natural reserves and trade influence, no real restrictions on its military or the travel of its population. So yes, we have to deal with him because he is the face of Russian politics but unlike Hitler he has not become so through restrictions imposed on the nation by others.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2022 12:08:41 GMT
Franz Ferdinand and his wife were shot and killed by a Serb student Gavrilo Princip who was imprisoned and died from Typhoid later but this led to a conflict/invasion. The war (WW1) followed. After that the 'allies' ripped the guts out of Germany and the short lived Weimar republic followed. Factor in the flu epidemic, the 20's crash and workers taking their pay home in wheelbarrows because inflation was so high a wheelbarrow of cash might buy you a loaf of bread.
Taking massive reparation from Germany left it ripe for an extremist to step in which he promptly did. Facts, despite the NAZI party heirachy milking the recovery for everything they could, Germans got a lot of positives so they felt good about themselves again and that is why they followed Hitler. Looking at the fall of the USSR you see a direct connection. USSR falls and there are incompetents running the show. Get rid of the major organisations and put these up to individual control rather than committee.
These oligarchs made fortunes out of it. These are the people who legitimised Putin. People had one source of information but they felt better off, proud to be Russian again. Lets not forget that lots of people died through the transformation from Soviet union to Russian federation.
The average Russian is as good a human being as any nation but until Putin is gone this sort of thing is on the cards. I believe that Cuba is more interested in making a connection with the USA rather than Russia these days.
Simplistic I know but, Could it have been different if we had supported the change from the Warsaw Pact to the Russian federation more fully?
|
|
|
Post by Ben on Mar 5, 2022 12:29:33 GMT
That's a slippery slope to go down, because it means going back to the days of colonisation. I don't think that's where we want to be heading towards. It's not a slippery slope. It's the playing field we've been on for generations. What were the Cuban missile crisis or the Vietnam war or the Georgian war about? The slippery slope is to pretend that powerful countries cannot and do not exert a sphere of influence. Imagine a world where every country decides it has the right to complete self determination - how many minutes after Taiwan joined NATO would an invasion start? That still doesn't make it right. Just because you can doesn't mean you should. I draw a parallel with where I am, Singapore. We're a tiny country with a majority Chinese-origin population (the only independent nation in the world to be as such), but culturally we're as far removed from China as we can be. We don't kowtow to China, and if China decides one day to "have claims" on us, you can bet your ass we'll put up one hell of a fight, and call our friends in as well (there's a reason we signed so many defence pacts with Australia, US and etc).
|
|
|
Post by ChrisM on Mar 5, 2022 17:44:03 GMT
I have just one 50p coin in my possession at the moment; I've been out today and declined to spend it since it bears a rather poignant message:
|
|
|
Post by garry on Mar 7, 2022 15:27:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by racingteatray on Mar 7, 2022 17:04:13 GMT
That’s what the Russians say. If Putin tells you it is raining outside, you would be very foolish if you didn’t look out of the window to check. And probably discover it’s sunny but raining 150 miles away, which on a technicality is outside.
|
|
|
Post by johnc on Mar 7, 2022 17:54:42 GMT
I really don't think it is as simple as that. Putin was accused of telling lies when he said that Russia had no intention of invading, the day before his troops marched in. Putin's spokesman said that Putin always told the truth and that what he had said was just military misinformation. Putin and the Russian military are proud of their history of misinformation and fooling their enemies. Given the current brazen war crimes and the targeting of civilians, I see no reason to believe that what Putin says he wants is anything other than another smokescreen for further action elsewhere. If Putin wants peace he should hold a proper ceasefire and withdraw his troops on the understanding that these matters are addressed properly. I believe he is not doing this because this guarantee he says he wants is just today's misinformation. The Russians have called wolf a few too many times to be believed anymore. Putin also said, as the invasion began, that he was ridding Ukraine of the drug dealers and the Nazis. A week on he makes a statement that he has always considered Ukraine to be part of Russia and he is bringing it back under Russian control. He probably has so many stories and lies that he can't remember who he said what to. Russia started it and they have the power to stop it. War is inhumane and should always be the last resort. Things didn't need to get this far but Putin's first reaction is to bully rather than talk and that is a dangerous trait.
|
|
|
Post by Big Blue on Mar 7, 2022 18:50:42 GMT
So just to prove how much Putin wants to see the stability of Ukraine as a non-NATO state his solution is to make it uninhabitable. Has he made the same statement about Finland? and what his response have been if NATO said they didn't like a Russian puppet-state in Belarus as a NATO neighbour and demand that no Russian military action could ever be launched from there?
Yes a simplistic kind of demand from Putin to feed his simplistic advocates, but not really any kind of simple solution. As ever the Russian simple solution is as we are seeing being played out. The Rouble is just about half the value it was before this invasion - even his simplistic advocates must see that he's a dickhead as they work out if they're having half a loaf of bread or only 2 hours of heating a day.
|
|
|
Post by racingteatray on Mar 7, 2022 19:07:11 GMT
And now only permitting refugees to leave Ukraine if they go to Russia or Belarus? Ie basically saying “oi you lot you’re mine now whether you like it or not”, which seems to be a bit like throwing a new version of the Berlin Wall up.
It’s just plain nasty.
In other news, this is the first time I’ve posted here from what the screen tells me is an altitude of 11,881m somewhere currently over Vienna. The wonders of modern tech.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2022 19:45:43 GMT
Got to love modern tech.
|
|
|
Post by PG on Mar 7, 2022 19:47:45 GMT
When Putin launched the invasion, the aim was clearly a rapid regime change allied to the destruction of Ukraine as a self-governing nation. Now it's all proved much harder, peace terms are offered. I reckon all Putin has achieved is to give the Ukranians even more stomach for the fight. If they can drag the war out and make the Russians suffer as much as possible the terms ought to get easier on the Ukranians. If Putin can't destroy Ukraine, then he needs a settlement to say he "won" to his home audience.
|
|
|
Post by garry on Mar 7, 2022 20:10:14 GMT
So just to prove how much Putin wants to see the stability of Ukraine as a non-NATO state his solution is to make it uninhabitable. Has he made the same statement about Finland? and what his response have been if NATO said they didn't like a Russian puppet-state in Belarus as a NATO neighbour and demand that no Russian military action could ever be launched from there? Yes a simplistic kind of demand from Putin to feed his simplistic advocates, but not really any kind of simple solution. As ever the Russian simple solution is as we are seeing being played out. The Rouble is just about half the value it was before this invasion - even his simplistic advocates must see that he's a dickhead as they work out if they're having half a loaf of bread or only 2 hours of heating a day. I thinks it’s incredibly simplistic to see Putin as bad, his opponents as good. It also sounds a little over the top to describe Ukraine as uninhabitable - I don’t want to downplay the horrific personal cost to those poor citizens who’ve lost their lives, but the vast majority of the country hasn’t seen any conflict. Finland isn’t part of NATO and hasn’t made moves to be part of it for the very reasons I say Ukraine should not join. The problem with arguing ‘what if nato didn’t like Belarus as a neighbour’ is that nato has expanded to the Belarus border. It has an expansionist policy that is central to the issue with Putin.
|
|
|
Post by garry on Mar 7, 2022 20:35:55 GMT
And now only permitting refugees to leave Ukraine if they go to Russia or Belarus? Ie basically saying “oi you lot you’re mine now whether you like it or not”, which seems to be a bit like throwing a new version of the Berlin Wall up. It’s just plain nasty. In other news, this is the first time I’ve posted here from what the screen tells me is an altitude of 11,881m somewhere currently over Vienna. The wonders of modern tech. I hope you’re in a plane! Re the safe routes out of Ukraine, the war zone is mostly on the Russian/Belarus border. Routes immediately south have been damaged to slow the Russian invasion. It must be 400 miles to the Polish border from the war zone.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2022 21:06:35 GMT
The latest agreement between Finland and NATO is that even more joint exercises will take place. If Putin was uncomfortable before it is going to get much worse. Allowing for Russia being bankrupted and Russian citizens being warned they better not have more savings than they declared, or they will be seized, being a Russian is going to hell in a hand basket. Russians are as decent as anyone and they do not deserve the carp any more than the Russians do.
Healthy competition yes, bloody warfare from paranoia not so much.
Crying won't fix this nor will sanctions and the PRC saying one thing in public but another in private will give the tin man more support.
We humans can be real shits at times.
|
|
|
Post by Big Blue on Mar 7, 2022 21:15:47 GMT
The problem with arguing ‘what if nato didn’t like Belarus as a neighbour’ is that nato has expanded to the Belarus border. It has an expansionist policy that is central to the issue with Putin. I think it’s been said somewhere above that countries actively request to join NATO. That none are actively requesting to join the Russian federation says more about the view of “Putin bad - Western Europe good” than any personal rantings from me or anyone else.
|
|
|
Post by Tim on Mar 8, 2022 8:57:56 GMT
Given that the East of Ukraine is allegedly so fiercely pro-Russian how many of these citizens have taken the opportunity to seek safe haven along the humanitarian corridors to the Motherland - clearly with the intention of saving themselves from upcoming bloodshed - before they can triumphantly return back to the 'independent' state of Donbas, or whatever they choose to call it when the time comes?
If you believe the propaganda put out by the Russian state machine surely there must be millions waiting to do this?
I'm pretty sure the real answer is a handful.
|
|
|
Post by Big Blue on Mar 8, 2022 9:29:45 GMT
Just under 60,000 thus far according to official figures. But if I were a Russian propagandist I’d say the Russians in Ukraine don’t need to flee and are now released from the Nazi stronghold in Kiev that has gripped them in terror for so long.
|
|
|
Post by Tim on Mar 8, 2022 11:57:40 GMT
Quite.
I saw there were a lot of Russians heading across the border to Finland.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2022 12:05:00 GMT
Not ALL stupid are they?
|
|
|
Post by alf on Mar 8, 2022 15:09:36 GMT
And for clarity I’m not a Putin supporter. I’m a right-of-centre free marketeer who wants to live in a world where the playing field is level and kids from any background and any region have the same opportunities that I’ve had to carve out the life that I want. I’m also a pragmatist. Putin is a bad man, but he’s what we’ve got to work with. To write him off as our version of Hitler seems short sighted and potentially dangerous. It is useful that you say this, because its not entirely clear otherwise. Aside from saying it's no real problem to shell a nuclear power plant, or set up supposed humanitarian corridors into the aggressor's country only, you seem generally to think that people from this region do not have the right to a level playing field - they are near to Russia and deserve to be subjugated by them. I don't see how its simplistic or idealistic to point out that Ukraine's eventual leanings towards the West were democratically inspired - its the whole point. Every human should have that right to freedom and self-determination, this is what Ukrainian people chose and we should not be condoning the violence towards them that has led to millions being displaced as a result. I would die for that right, and I would kill others to defend it. Clearly a lot of Ukrainians feel that way too. One reason this is all becoming incredibly dangerous is that Putin's forces have made a total pigs ear of it. Their much-vaunted modernised armed forces have performed appallingly, falling way short of expectations on all sides. Sanctions have been far stronger than expected, and getting stronger. NATO has been made miles stronger, and - critically - countries like Germany are taking their defence commitments seriously for the first time in ages. The result could not be worse from Putin's view but the limited options this leaves him are a real concern. I stand by my Hitler-like comments (this is my degree subject after all, and my dissertation was on Vietnam) and that Putin was never "just" after Ukraine. What he will do next is a huge issue, and we do need to be mindful of not backing him into a corner too far if he will potentially use nuclear weapons.
|
|
|
Post by Big Blue on Mar 8, 2022 16:25:00 GMT
I am also concerned at the impending scenario of Putin resorting to the nuclear option. The issue is one will be fired first and where will it be aimed at? I don’t think a second will be fired but I do see a huge non-nuclear war following it.
|
|
|
Post by johnc on Mar 8, 2022 16:41:18 GMT
I am also concerned at the impending scenario of Putin resorting to the nuclear option. The issue is one will be fired first and where will it be aimed at? I don’t think a second will be fired but I do see a huge non-nuclear war following it. What worries me is that Putin sees the UK as Russia's natural enemy and hitting us or maybe one of our carriers would probably give him a great sense of achievement. By picking us instead of the US, he probably averts nuclear Armageddon but more than makes his point.
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Mar 8, 2022 17:03:05 GMT
Hitting a UK target doesn't prevent all out war. As a NATO country he can't just nuke us and expect no response or for the US to not be involved. My worry is that if he does use one it will be aimed at Kyiv in an 'if I can't have it no one will' attack should he feel that he's not going to be able to take the country. It would be the biggest act of petulance in world history but I wouldn't put it past him.
|
|
|
Post by garry on Mar 8, 2022 19:44:38 GMT
And for clarity I’m not a Putin supporter. I’m a right-of-centre free marketeer who wants to live in a world where the playing field is level and kids from any background and any region have the same opportunities that I’ve had to carve out the life that I want. I’m also a pragmatist. Putin is a bad man, but he’s what we’ve got to work with. To write him off as our version of Hitler seems short sighted and potentially dangerous. It is useful that you say this, because its not entirely clear otherwise. Aside from saying it's no real problem to shell a nuclear power plant, or set up supposed humanitarian corridors into the aggressor's country only, you seem generally to think that people from this region do not have the right to a level playing field - they are near to Russia and deserve to be subjugated by them. I don't see how its simplistic or idealistic to point out that Ukraine's eventual leanings towards the West were democratically inspired - its the whole point. Every human should have that right to freedom and self-determination, this is what Ukrainian people chose and we should not be condoning the violence towards them that has led to millions being displaced as a result. I would die for that right, and I would kill others to defend it. Clearly a lot of Ukrainians feel that way too. One reason this is all becoming incredibly dangerous is that Putin's forces have made a total pigs ear of it. Their much-vaunted modernised armed forces have performed appallingly, falling way short of expectations on all sides. Sanctions have been far stronger than expected, and getting stronger. NATO has been made miles stronger, and - critically - countries like Germany are taking their defence commitments seriously for the first time in ages. The result could not be worse from Putin's view but the limited options this leaves him are a real concern. I stand by my Hitler-like comments (this is my degree subject after all, and my dissertation was on Vietnam) and that Putin was never "just" after Ukraine. What he will do next is a huge issue, and we do need to be mindful of not backing him into a corner too far if he will potentially use nuclear weapons. We agree that backing him into a corner is a bad idea. I’ve told you what I think should happen. What’s your plan for not backing him into a corner. Easy to throw stones, harder to be constructive.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2022 22:28:25 GMT
Well, who would have thunk it, the eu grew a pair. About bleeping time.
|
|
|
Post by johnc on Mar 9, 2022 17:16:46 GMT
Russians now shelling and destroying a maternity hospital in Mariupol. This has turned into genocide and the war crimes are piling up. Someone in the Kremlin needs to waken up and realise that these actions are the work of a madman and also young, poorly trained but frightened troops. The West also needs to provide Ukraine with the weapons to rid the sky of Russian jets and target the artillery. This whole war is an atrocity.
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Mar 9, 2022 18:28:43 GMT
Russians now shelling and destroying a maternity hospital in Mariupol. This has turned into genocide and the war crimes are piling up. Someone in the Kremlin needs to waken up and realise that these actions are the work of a madman and also young, poorly trained but frightened troops. The West also needs to provide Ukraine with the weapons to rid the sky of Russian jets and target the artillery. This whole war is an atrocity. Agree the Russians are committing more and more atrocities which is a key sign of an army that is no longer in control and has clearly failed in their mission to swiftly take out the government and are now turning to brutally pounding them into submission. Worse will come if it carries on. Trouble is no western government wants to directly go into battle and no-one in the Kremlin is brave (or stupid) enough to stand up to Putin and his henchmen.
|
|
|
Post by Big Blue on Mar 9, 2022 19:00:10 GMT
The Russian military leaders have had to resort to bombardment because their soldiers are totally disillusioned. Slav chat rooms have reported that when the troops are in amongst the civilians they realise that they are not being welcomed with open arms as the saviours and are visibly terrified when among huge numbers of people that want to tear them apart limb by limb with bare hands. Nothing can stop the genocide and physical destruction because no one that speaks common sense can access The Kremlin without being punished.
There are also large numbers of Russians that support the special military operation because they only watch and read Russian media so know for certain a just and right operation is being played out.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2022 22:15:15 GMT
|
|