|
Post by Martin on Jul 14, 2017 18:20:48 GMT
That's around £700 a month on a pcp with 10% in. Cheaper to buy a Macan and probably an X5 and all the other suspects from the next size up. Wow, that's crazy. Not a surprise though, as a decent spec diesel F Pace is about the same as a similarly equipped Macan Turbo PP, maybe there will be a lot of equity in it at the end, but it's a risk. Not sure about the headlights, but I like it overall.
|
|
|
Post by Martin on Jul 14, 2017 18:30:43 GMT
I've just configured a D250 to the minimum spec I would have if ordering one and it came to £54,925. So, £10,000 down and it's £935 over 3 years or £790 a month over 4 years
That's rediculous for a small (4 cylinder diesel) SUV, even one with a decent spec.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2017 21:31:50 GMT
Why the fuck is there a ten and a half grand price jump between a 250PS petrol engine and a 300PS one?!
|
|
|
Post by Ben on Jul 15, 2017 9:51:44 GMT
Oh wow. That looks really good.
Want.
|
|
|
Post by Nelson on Jul 15, 2017 16:37:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by boc70 on Jul 15, 2017 17:57:15 GMT
The E-Pace is a Jaguar Evoque to be less polite about it. I'm sure they share surprisingly few parts but it's that sort of size and I believe a little cheaper. They're going to be everywhere. +1 This will sell really well. That chassis which will now underpin the Evoque, Discovery Sport and now E-Pace will speak for quite a big % of total JLR production. Disco Sport is already JLR's fastest selling vehicle, overtaking Evoque in sales per month. Purely anecdotally of course, but we've just spent a week in SW Scotland and the dealer principal at Lloyd Carlisle must be leafing enthusiastically through yacht brochures, going by how many Disco Sports I've seen here.
|
|
|
Post by chipbutty on Jul 17, 2017 9:34:02 GMT
Because the 250ps engine is available in all trim levels, the 300ps in higher trim levels - so if you equalise the spec, the difference is just under £4k.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2017 11:30:09 GMT
Then the configurator is flawed. It asks you to pick a model trim first and then the engine. When you then go down the engine selections all it shows is the price jumping from £37,450 to £47,950...
|
|
|
Post by Bob Sacamano v2.0 on Jul 17, 2017 12:23:39 GMT
I'l confess that when I saw the title to this thread I assumed it was about some new Jaguar competitor to the Tesla. The name's a bit misleading in 2017.
Nice looking little car but ridiculous price if what has been posted is true - it might be a competitor to the Q3 and Q5 but they seem to be about half the monthly price of one of these.
|
|
|
Post by alf on Jul 17, 2017 12:49:38 GMT
That's around £700 a month on a pcp with 10% in. Cheaper to buy a Macan and probably an X5 and all the other suspects from the next size up. That's not buying one though is it - that's paying to cover the (lower) depreciation for a bit. Porsche servicing and parts will get you too - I just booked the XFR in for its 75k / 6 year service and they warned me it was pricey, but even with the unobtanium XFR oil and a brake fluid change it's still well under £500. Porsche charge that to phone you to tell you how much the service will be I'll have to have a look at the E Pace specs - sounds like they are not great. And if there is a huge price difference between the 250 and 300ps petrols, then the 250 sounds fine to me - what difference does it make to an SUV? Going from a 250 to 300 ps 4 pot turbo is not going to feel that different, the power and torque low down is probably much the same on both. Nothing like the subjective difference of going from a 2 litre 4 port to a 3 litre 6 pot or something like that. I have quite a few friends from my old regular trackday times who have bought things like M135i and M240i's - the only way to make it a bargain seems to be to be really brutal/honest with yourself about what options to go for and get a bargain basement one. Especially if you get an early one then sell before many other SH ones are on the market, you'll sell it no worries. Overall it looks nice but not as nice as the F Pace to me, that car's bigger overhangs suit it (opposite of the XE/XF situation) and I must admit to having a bit of a pang for an F Pace with the V6 supercharged petrol motor in it. Must have a go some time... Cliche's southern english mountain biker vehicle or what? F Pace and E Pace interiors both look great to me.
|
|
|
Post by chipbutty on Jul 17, 2017 13:34:51 GMT
There are spec packs that you add to the trim level - so you pick your trim level (R-Dynamic) and then you pick an engine and then you pick a spec pack (S, SE, HSE).
The 300ps engine is only available with an SE spec pack and above - hence the cost differential. Similarly, the manuals and lower powered diesels can't be had above the S level trim pack
If it was arranged to go trim level, spec pack and then engine - you would be excluding certain engine derivatives on certain spec packs.
|
|
|
Post by chipbutty on Jul 17, 2017 13:41:17 GMT
You've loaded equipment onto what is an entry level car - many of the items you have selected (and some you haven't) are standard on the D240 R Dynamic HSE - which starts at £48,650....
Your configuration also has £2k's worth of " Jaguar Gear " - would you really put all that stuff on your car ? - or are points being made with outlandish configurations.
|
|
|
Post by PetrolEd on Jul 17, 2017 14:05:58 GMT
ALF - "That's not buying one though is it"
Call it what you like but its how the majority of buyers pay for new cars these days and vital for repeat custom to get these figures cheap.
|
|
|
Post by PetrolEd on Jul 17, 2017 14:13:14 GMT
You've loaded equipment onto what is an entry level car - many of the items you have selected (and some you haven't) are standard on the D240 R Dynamic HSE - which starts at £48,650.... Your configuration also has £2k's worth of " Jaguar Gear " - would you really put all that stuff on your car ? - or are points being made with outlandish configurations. Do you think my configuration was outlandish? I was trying to be fair to Jag if anything.
|
|
|
Post by chipbutty on Jul 17, 2017 15:10:26 GMT
Just looked at it now....
Nope - seems very reasonable - how much would the equivalent spec German car list at ?
|
|
|
Post by PG on Jul 17, 2017 15:31:15 GMT
Just looked at it now.... Nope - seems very reasonable - how much would the equivalent spec German car list at ? I did look at the E-Pace v ze Germans the other day. I compared a D150 AWD Auto Dynamic R E-Pace (I'm guessing that's probably what most people on PCP will go for) and it was this - E-Pace D150 AWD auto Dynamic R £38,150 Q3 150PS Quattro S Line S-Tronic £33,515 but no leather. With leather and upgraded sat nav was £37k X1 150PS X-drive auto M Sport £34,580 In the next size up, looking at the same spec - F-Pace D180 AWD Auto R Sport £41,330 Q5 190PS quattro S line S-tronic £40,200 X3 190PS quattro S Line S-tronic £40,500 X5's are not available with anything below a 231PS diesel and that starts at £54k (unless I'm mis-reading the configurator) Interesting comparison too to Land Rover stable - Evoque D180 AWD Auto from £35k, probably about £38k spec for spec but has the bigger engine Disco Sport D180 AWD auto, from £34k and again about £37k in same-ish spec. So out of that lot, the one that looks cheaper is the Q3. But it's an ugly bugger - like a blamanche on wheels. I reckon if you go into the options list heavily on any of the above, it will scare the crap out of you.
As said above, I reckon the E-Pace must suffer a bit as it's being built by Magna, so that's got to cost more then Halewood where the Evoque and Disoc sport are built. Especially with the £ / Euro where it is. From a Jag perspective, it looks like the E-Pace v F-Pace decision is space and image related, rather then purely price. Whereas, say, X1 to X3 has a bigger price jump.
|
|
|
Post by michael on Jul 17, 2017 15:44:38 GMT
I don't think the price is a problem. I seem to recall a few of us raised an eyebrow or two when the Evoque pricing was announced and that hasn't had a problem selling by the truck load. Funny looking at those old threads with the benefit of hindsight, GBB successfully predicting the Velar.
|
|
|
Post by Martin on Jul 17, 2017 15:48:59 GMT
Oh, of course they will sell, it's the latest thing! It's quite likely that the residuals will be better than in the current PCP deals, so it probably won't be as expensive as it looks, but that's a bit of a risk.
I wouldn't be too concerned about Porsche servicing costs. They have a fixed price structure and as a relevant example, a Macan Turbo will cost £425 for a 2 year / 20k service and £580 after 4 years / 40k miles assuming it needs brake fluid changing as well. That's not bad for a £75-80k car. The first service I paid for on the BMW was a minor with brake fluid (58k miles) and that cost £457, so not much difference. .
|
|
|
Post by Martin on Jul 17, 2017 15:54:55 GMT
I don't think the price is a problem. I seem to recall a few of us raised an eyebrow or two when the Evoque pricing was announced and that hasn't had a problem selling by the truck load. Funny looking at those old threads with the benefit of hindsight, GBB successfully predicting the Velar. Keeping that link for when you buy a Discovery!
|
|
|
Post by michael on Jul 17, 2017 15:59:49 GMT
Was tempted to edit... although I think someone else will be editing theirs before long.
|
|
|
Post by racingteatray on Jul 17, 2017 19:20:37 GMT
I am under-surprised that the E-SprayTan is costly and expensive on PCP.
I really quite fancied an XE-S (and my wife definitely preferred it to the BMW) but there was simply no way to make the numbers stack up in its favour. First-off, specced to my liking, it was actually £2k more than a 440i GC to start with, and then between a high APR and a low GFV, it was around £120/month more (ie about 30%), which is a lot over 4 years.
Actually, it's interesting looking back and seeing how prices have changed in seven months:
440i GC - £43,750 in Dec '16 - £45,490 in Jul '17 (£1,740 rise) XE-S - £44,995 in Dec '16 - £48,045 in Jul '17 (£3,050 rise) S5 Sportback - £46,995 in Dec '16 - £47,875 in Jul '17 (£880 rise) C43 AMG Estate - £45,230 in Dec '16 - £47,030 in Jul '17 (£1,800 rise)
|
|
|
Post by alf on Jul 21, 2017 16:47:14 GMT
That's interesting Racing - especially as those are all cars on my long-list for whenever I change! I wonder if trading in £ after the Brexit vote has hit Jaguar. To be fair to it, the EX-S has also been updated recently to have some clear air in power between itself and those 3.
I looked on AT just now at second hand XE-S and F Pace V6S petrol prices. The former start at around £30k and the latter over £50k. Meanwhile, if you can ignore the slightly leggy 2009 age, you can have a dealer-supplied XFR with only 16,000 miles on the clock for less than £20k. Guess which I think is the best value... Only the facelifted XFR's seem to be asking silly money. The others are still total bargains compared to ze Germans - and a better car IMHO, and cheaper to run too, plus you can park them anywhere without trouble, and not get raced, as knobs don't seem to notice them.
The E-Pace would be a perfect family car for us in 2-litre petrol form, but I fear it will be a long time before the prices are anything like what I would be prepared to pay!
|
|
|
Post by Bob Sacamano v2.0 on Jul 22, 2017 11:44:43 GMT
I don't think the price is a problem. I seem to recall a few of us raised an eyebrow or two when the Evoque pricing was announced and that hasn't had a problem selling by the truck load. Funny looking at those old threads with the benefit of hindsight, GBB successfully predicting the Velar. Keeping that link for when you buy a Discovery! If forgotten that thread! There were a couple of right dicks arguing about RRs, and only one of them was me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2018 12:40:57 GMT
Autocar did a full road test of a high trim spec one last week - 180 PS derv in SE trim. List of £40k, topped up by another eight in options. Good points are high expected residuals, steering and high speed ride, looks too (but that is of course subjective.)
Low speed ride is poor, handling not what would be expected of a Jaag, there's a suspicion it's a sight heavier than advertised (because of the old platform) and the engine's not stellar.
But God, it's slow. Cracks 60 in 10s by the skin of its teeth, and 0-100 takes 31s - and these are in dry conditions. 30-70 through the gears is getting on for 11s. Just plant your imaginary foot at 30 and count that out - and if anything that would take longer as the figure I quote assumes you are already accelerating hard (relatively speaking). That's fuck all in the way of performance for the price, even at list.
I wonder who buys these things? I take it most are 'rented', in the modern way.
EDIT - Jaag quotes 8.7s to 60/9.3s to 100km/h. Hmm. 6/10ths for 2 additional mph? JLR seems to overstate its SUVs' performance and understate their weight.
|
|
|
Post by Tim on Apr 16, 2018 12:37:29 GMT
I'm sure it'll sell a load to people who want the next shiny thing that's not German after their Evoque.
|
|