|
Post by ChrisM on Apr 8, 2019 12:41:55 GMT
Can "It is I, Leclerc", take his first F1 victory in China? Will Seb spin off again? Can Red Bull make progress? All to play for, especially at Ferrari
|
|
|
Post by Ben on Apr 8, 2019 19:12:51 GMT
It is the 1000th F1 race too. Hopefully it'll be spectacular.
|
|
|
Post by Sav on Apr 12, 2019 23:34:53 GMT
Not sure if anyone has read rumours about Sky trying to drop Ted Kravitz. He was missing from Melbourne and Bahrain, and going from the Twitter response, viewers were not happy. Quite rightly, his notebook is fantastic during the GP weekends. Plus, there is nothing like Ted patrolling the pitlane on a Friday morning for the latest developments. For me, Sky still lacks a technical analyst. They had Pat Symonds for selected races a few years ago, which was good. Considering this is a dedicated F1 channel, aimed at the dedicated fan, it’s a surprising omission. Gary Anderson was fantastic on the BBC a few years ago, they need someone like him.
There were a lot of tyre marbles on the back straight in FP2, and that was without all 20 cars continuously running around. During the race it will probably get worse, which means venturing off line is going to be interesting. It does illustrate how significant tyre degradation will be on Sunday; I actually think that qualifying might not be indicative of the competitive order in the Grand Prix itself.
|
|
|
Post by Andy C on Apr 14, 2019 8:07:26 GMT
It is the 1000th F1 race too. Hopefully it'll be spectacular. Bet you’re regretting that comment now
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2019 8:08:08 GMT
So much for it being "Ferrari's year". Again...
|
|
|
Post by Ben on Apr 14, 2019 10:09:02 GMT
It is the 1000th F1 race too. Hopefully it'll be spectacular. Bet you’re regretting that comment now Quite. Oh well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2019 10:19:35 GMT
Three races in and Hamilton could sit out the fourth and still be in the top 2 in the drivers' standings!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2019 15:31:16 GMT
Ferrari ended up ruining Leclerc's race and frankly Seb was a damp squib in comparison to his time at Red Bull. Is he really interested? It seems that Ferrari will have a new number one by next season. Risible reliability for Renault reduces their opportunity to compete while Honda continue to improve. I wonder what McLaren are thinking right about now. Low points haul for me this weekend.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2019 15:32:40 GMT
Why do the common taters pronounce LeClerc LeClair? He himself pronounces the c at the end and so should they.
|
|
|
Post by Big Blue on Apr 14, 2019 17:53:05 GMT
Pretty dull race. Kimi had a bit of fun but it was largely shite.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2019 7:18:53 GMT
I'm currently buying old GP DVDs from eBay and watching highlights from seasons that were interesting. Nothing I hear or read about F1 persuades me that I am missing anything.
|
|
|
Post by Sav on Apr 15, 2019 23:05:54 GMT
Regarding Ferrari’s driver swap in Shanghai, it was the right idea with the wrong execution. Immediately after Leclerc let Vettel by, he tried to follow him to have the DRS enabled. That put Vettel under pressure, he started to lock up a few times, which just slowed them both down with Leclerc following inn turbulent air. One can understand why Leclerc wanted to make a point, he’s there to race – and long may that continue. But they wanted to release Vettel to see if he could try and catch Bottas, that didn’t happen. Being a marginal track on degradation, leaving a driver out for too long is a recipe for disaster. That is exactly what they did with Leclerc, resulting in Verstappen leapfrogging the Ferrari and almost passing Vettel. They ruined Leclerc’s race, fearing something that wasn’t a threat in the first place.
There seems to be a split between both cars. The Ferrari has excellent traction coming off tight turns, it evidently has fantastic acceleration as well, a straight line advantage it retains over the Mercedes until v max. Unfortunately, Shanghai has a lot more roll-time than Bahrain – where the driver is off-throttle – most commonly around long-radius corners. I think the heavy fuel in the race exacerbated Mercedes’ advantage; the front-end of the Mercedes was notably keener in turn 13, for example. You’ve then got the long back straight where the Ferrari starts to catch up, but if you’re exiting the corners faster whilst protecting the tyres to a greater degree, that is a more effective strength to have.
Albon was very impressive. He crashed heavily in FP3; the team had to re-build the car overnight and started in the pitlane. Despite missing valuable track time, he drove a very intelligent race with a one-stop strategy, and withstood immense pressure from Grosjean who had much newer tyres at the end. That is the sort of drive that gets noticed.
This is not only a Formula 1 problem, but more series need to take inspiration from IndyCar. I really think it’s the best championship out there at present. You have a degree of technical variance without it being an arms race. Balance of performance isn’t needed, so you don’t need endlessly-changing rules every weekend. No driver aids, including power steering or tyre warmers. Every lap looks difficult, not just a qualifying lap at tenth tenths. You even see a few sportscar teams entering IndyCar because they know with a good driver, they can legitimately compete on the most equal footing there is in major four-wheeled motorsport in 2019. Despite how much sportscar racing is applauded, I think it’s getting frustrating with Bop that ultimately satisfies nobody.
I was watching the Formula E on Saturday and I was reminded by something that Richard Meaden said in Evo last month, it’s a future – but perhaps not the future that will prevail. It just doesn’t look racy, and despite them being nose-to-tail, it just lacks the x factor that combustion motorsport still has. FE is a very impressive set-up, I find it remarkable how well the races have gone. So many street circuits have been abandoned at the last moment; FE has created a niche for itself in a very crowded market. But despite the impressive organisation and growing manufacturer interest, it isn’t exciting me. Excitement is not necessarily how close the cars are, and how FE manages the manufacturer interest will be pivotal. I fear that once a few of the manufacturers find they can’t win, they will leave – it always happens in racing. On Sunday I was watching the Australian V8 Supercars and just reflected how fabulous it was. The sensational noise, the lack of aero, the visible driver involvement with the driver manually rev-matching on the downshifts makes it fantastic to watch.
|
|
|
Post by ChrisM on Apr 16, 2019 7:28:22 GMT
^ You really ought to get a job as a single-seater racing journalist
|
|
|
Post by Eff One on Apr 16, 2019 8:51:47 GMT
Dull race, but there were some unheralded star turns in the midfield. Perez did a mighty job to qualify 12th and finish 8th in a Racing Point that was a marginal Q2 car. Kimi looks to be enjoying himself in the Alfa. And Danny Ric's starting to get on top of the Renault.
I imagine Toro Rosso will be pissed off. They should have had 2 cars in Q3 and a haul of points. Albon did very well to recover to 10th after a forgivable rookie mistake, but should have been dicing with the Renaults. Likewise Kvyat, whose Q2 mistake put him further back than he should have been, which led to the Mclaren pinball incident. I do think the penalty was harsh though. He made a small error which had unfortunate consequences. Looked like a racing incident to me.
|
|
|
Post by Andy C on Apr 16, 2019 9:23:57 GMT
I'm currently buying old GP DVDs from eBay and watching highlights from seasons that were interesting. Nothing I hear or read about F1 persuades me that I am missing anything. Same , but I’m doing it on YouTube . I get my current racing fix From the BTCC
|
|