|
Post by racingteatray on Sept 27, 2017 10:18:07 GMT
Been away for a couple of days and came back to find that, after a few weeks with no sign of them, the local foxes are back with a vengeance.
Not only have they been scrabbling all over the car to get over our garden wall (the photos don't quite show the footprints as clearly as you can see them in person, but you can see from the rips in the cover just how nasty the scratches could be if the car didn't have the cover fitted) but they have also pissed on one corner and chewed off one of the retaining straps. And that's before we discuss the nocturnal screaming.
I am not allowed by law to kill or injure the bloody things. But I assure you that I would happily fling all of them into the Thames in weighted sacks.
|
|
|
Post by LandieMark on Sept 27, 2017 10:26:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by racingteatray on Sept 27, 2017 10:38:10 GMT
We are supposed to have got a company in to, in so far as possible, professionally fox-proof the complex by blocking off the main access points and putting deterrents down, but either they've not been yet or it's completely ineffective.
|
|
|
Post by michael on Sept 27, 2017 10:55:59 GMT
That's a pain. We're not generally troubled by them on account of deer fencing around the perimeter and large dogs they don't seem keen on - obviously not an option in central London.
|
|
|
Post by Big Blue on Sept 27, 2017 11:31:41 GMT
You won't believe the shock and horror on my FiL's face when we explained to him about Foxes "rights" in London. Where he lives the FIRST thing you do when you see a fox is shoot it. Dead. Immediately. In his words: they are the biggest spreader of disease and malice in the forest, and he's the local forest governor.
We have a couple of mangy examples locally and I've had to chase the fuckers out of the garden on more than one occasion. I'm also certain you only need to dispatch them humanely if you actually tell anyone about it.....
|
|
|
Post by humphreythepug on Sept 27, 2017 13:33:45 GMT
Try washing fox shit out of dog fur!!
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Sept 27, 2017 15:41:47 GMT
Try washing fox shit out of dog fur!! Nah, you're alright Humph!
|
|
|
Post by franki68 on Sept 27, 2017 15:53:42 GMT
We had a female fox in our garden at night making mating calls,it was horrendous and sent the dogs mental.
|
|
|
Post by racingteatray on Sept 27, 2017 20:41:10 GMT
We had a female fox in our garden at night making mating calls,it was horrendous and sent the dogs mental. Imagine what it sounds like when she is joined by four dog foxes all fighting and vying for her attention. Sounds like Bedlam.
|
|
|
Post by michael on Sept 27, 2017 20:45:37 GMT
I know a few people with red jackets and horses who'd be happy to help...
|
|
|
Post by racingteatray on Sept 28, 2017 9:21:46 GMT
I know a few people with red jackets and horses who'd be happy to help... Although we do live in Fulham, which has no shortage of hunting Henriettas and Hugos, I suspect our Labour council might take against the Beaufort in full cry rampaging through the borough. And in fairness, the damage caused by a couple of foxes pales to the destruction that a hunt can wreak in minutes as it galumphs through....not something you want near your house or garden!
|
|
|
Post by michael on Sept 28, 2017 10:43:07 GMT
Find where they live and place a 'suspicious package'nearby? Maybe the bomb squad can dispose of them humanly... I feel like we can solve this.
|
|
|
Post by johnc on Sept 28, 2017 12:11:00 GMT
Does chocolate kill foxes in the same way it does dogs. A box of Aldi's best accidentally left in the garden when unloading the car.
|
|
|
Post by franki68 on Sept 28, 2017 12:24:16 GMT
I know a few people with red jackets and horses who'd be happy to help... Whilst I appreciate how annoying foxes can be,Id rather those sort of people are hunted than the foxes. And there are loads near me,in fact there was hunt the other day.
|
|
|
Post by racingteatray on Sept 28, 2017 12:36:48 GMT
Does chocolate kill foxes in the same way it does dogs. A box of Aldi's best accidentally left in the garden when unloading the car. Doubt it. I think urban foxes could consume just about anything without ill effect. And the problem is not killing them, but deterring them. If you kill one, another will be along the next night to nab the newly vacated territory. You have to stop them wanting to be there.
|
|
|
Post by racingteatray on Sept 28, 2017 12:42:13 GMT
I know a few people with red jackets and horses who'd be happy to help... Whilst I appreciate how annoying foxes can be,Id rather those sort of people are hunted than the foxes. And there are loads near me,in fact there was hunt the other day. Why? Have they done you some harm or damaged your property? I am not even slightly interested in hunting, nor do I particularly socialise with people who hunt, but I would always defend the right of others to do it.
|
|
|
Post by franki68 on Sept 28, 2017 13:46:40 GMT
Whilst I appreciate how annoying foxes can be,Id rather those sort of people are hunted than the foxes. And there are loads near me,in fact there was hunt the other day. Why? Have they done you some harm or damaged your property? I am not even slightly interested in hunting, nor do I particularly socialise with people who hunt, but I would always defend the right of others to do it. I don’t like animals being hunted for sport.I worry what sort of person takes pleasure in killing and harming animals . why would you defend their rights to commit an illegal act btw?
|
|
|
Post by LandieMark on Sept 28, 2017 14:01:15 GMT
Without wanting to divide the forum, I used to hunt regularly when I was a child. I can count the number of kills on one hand. It was never about the kill. It was purely about riding quickly over different terrain and not knowing what you would get next.
I have no problem in killing or harming pests and vermin, which is what foxes are. I quite happily shoot fluffy bunnies on my land too. I don’t derive any specific pleasure from it - it is simply necessary.
Since the ban, more foxes are killed because they have to be flushed and shot. What I don’t understand is the sabs trying to disrupt legal drag hunts.
|
|
|
Post by racingteatray on Sept 28, 2017 16:51:56 GMT
This is a complex area on which there are lots of perfectly valid points of view. For my part: (a) We are all entitled to our views but I don't think any of us has the right to take the moral high ground or to impose our ethics on others. (b) In my experience, people who don't shoot or hunt have a tendency to think that those who do are driven by wild blood lust and thirst for the death and destruction of the furred and feathered. Whereas I find that typically this is simply not true – I would agree with what Trevor said in this respect. (c) I think that there is a world of difference between killing animals and harming them. One is sadistic and the other is not, for starters. I too, would worry about anyone who takes pleasure in harming animals - it tends to be a mark of a psychopath. As for killing animals, personally I have little compunction about eg shooting a rabbit for dinner, but I catch spiders and flies and tip them outside, rather than squashing them (much to my wife's annoyance) because they are harmless and I see no reason to kill them, regardless of whether I find them horrid or not. As for your point about supporting an illegal activity, hunting in the sense of riding to hounds is not illegal. You're just not allowed to chase a fox in the process, so most hunts these days should be drag hunts. www.gov.uk/hunting/mammalsThe most obviously ridiculous part of this legislation (which really only got sufficient parliamentary time to be passed because Tony Blair saw it as (a) a useful sop to his left wing and (b) an even more useful distraction from his adventures in Iraq, the non-existent WMDs and the death of Dr Kelly) is that is of course that no matter whether you set out in the morning on a drag hunt, if the hounds get the scent of a real fox along the way, there's pretty much no way to stop them going after it.
|
|
|
Post by michael on Sept 28, 2017 17:50:06 GMT
I too remove spiders but I kill mosquitoes in the house. Much to my other halfs irritation I rehomed the worms I dug up when I dug the holes for the pergola posts. This saved them from getting caught up in the development and the moles in the garden - 13 of which have now been dispatched. The worms were rehomed in my compost bin which should be worm nirvana and they do seem to be thriving. I thought it was a good model for HS2 when I was building it.
|
|
|
Post by franki68 on Sept 28, 2017 20:19:37 GMT
This is a complex area on which there are lots of perfectly valid points of view. For my part: (a) We are all entitled to our views but I don't think any of us has the right to take the moral high ground or to impose our ethics on others. (b) In my experience, people who don't shoot or hunt have a tendency to think that those who do are driven by wild blood lust and thirst for the death and destruction of the furred and feathered. Whereas I find that typically this is simply not true – I would agree with what Trevor said in this respect. (c) I think that there is a world of difference between killing animals and harming them. One is sadistic and the other is not, for starters. I too, would worry about anyone who takes pleasure in harming animals - it tends to be a mark of a psychopath. As for killing animals, personally I have little compunction about eg shooting a rabbit for dinner, but I catch spiders and flies and tip them outside, rather than squashing them (much to my wife's annoyance) because they are harmless and I see no reason to kill them, regardless of whether I find them horrid or not. As for your point about supporting an illegal activity, hunting in the sense of riding to hounds is not illegal. You're just not allowed to chase a fox in the process, so most hunts these days should be drag hunts. www.gov.uk/hunting/mammalsThe most obviously ridiculous part of this legislation (which really only got sufficient parliamentary time to be passed because Tony Blair saw it as (a) a useful sop to his left wing and (b) an even more useful distraction from his adventures in Iraq, the non-existent WMDs and the death of Dr Kelly) is that is of course that no matter whether you set out in the morning on a drag hunt, if the hounds get the scent of a real fox along the way, there's pretty much no way to stop them going after it. I am talking about the illegal fox hunts,I know forms of fox hunting are legal.Nor am I imposing my personal beliefs on anyone,I am just stating I really don’t like it,I just think there are nicer ways of getting your thrills than by hunting down and killing an animal. I know they can be dangerous,the farm around the corner lost many turkeys to a fox and have no issue with the farmers dealing with that sort of issue. I just don’t like the idea of it being a sport for people’s entertaiment.I feel the same about boxing . On the positive side the hunting outfits are rather dapper.
|
|
|
Post by Roadsterstu on Sept 28, 2017 23:46:21 GMT
Without wanting to divide the forum, I used to hunt regularly when I was a child. I can count the number of kills on one hand. It was never about the kill. It was purely about riding quickly over different terrain and not knowing what you would get next. I have no problem in killing or harming pests and vermin, which is what foxes are. I quite happily shoot fluffy bunnies on my land too. I don’t derive any specific pleasure from it - it is simply necessary. Since the ban, more foxes are killed because they have to be flushed and shot. What I don’t understand is the sabs trying to disrupt legal drag hunts. Because the hunts behave rather less legally than they should?
|
|
|
Post by LandieMark on Sept 29, 2017 8:52:48 GMT
Without wanting to divide the forum, I used to hunt regularly when I was a child. I can count the number of kills on one hand. It was never about the kill. It was purely about riding quickly over different terrain and not knowing what you would get next. I have no problem in killing or harming pests and vermin, which is what foxes are. I quite happily shoot fluffy bunnies on my land too. I don’t derive any specific pleasure from it - it is simply necessary. Since the ban, more foxes are killed because they have to be flushed and shot. What I don’t understand is the sabs trying to disrupt legal drag hunts. Because the hunts behave rather less legally than they should? Some, possibly. The sabs around here like to disrupt our local drag hunt for no good reason whatsoever. They are nothing more than thugs dressed in hoodies and ski masks trying to pull people off horses etc.
|
|
|
Post by johnc on Sept 29, 2017 9:18:28 GMT
I have done some Googling and chocolate does indeed harm foxes.
|
|
|
Post by Bob Sacamano v2.0 on Sept 29, 2017 10:00:26 GMT
When fox hunting with hounds was legal and I used to pay an interest in the subject the pro-hunting lobby always insisted it wasn't about the kill, that they were relatively rare, and a far larger proportion of fox deaths were road casualties. It was all about rural tradition and community, keeping saddlers and the whole cottage industry that supported the hunting fraternity alive. Where my mother-in-law lived the Boxing Day hunt was a long tradition, with everyone meeting outside the pub, stirrup cups being drank and a right good get together.
When hunting with hounds was banned all of a sudden the pro-hunting lobby insisted it was all about vermin control and a necessary evil. So which is it?
My friend Artie is a farmer and was Master of a Hunt in Northumberland. He gave it up and won't have anything to do with it anymore. Too many people wanting to prove their entitlement to trespass, cause damage, and keen to be in on the kill, hear its screams, and see the fox torn apart.
|
|
|
Post by Roadsterstu on Oct 3, 2017 8:07:18 GMT
Because the hunts behave rather less legally than they should? Some, possibly. The sabs around here like to disrupt our local drag hunt for no good reason whatsoever. They are nothing more than thugs dressed in hoodies and ski masks trying to pull people off horses etc. Whilst most hunt sabs seem to be just that there is plenty of thuggish behaviour from the hunts and their supporters too. This claim of drag hunting is, generally, bullshit as well. There are ways the hunts make it appear that they are acting legally but when you look closer it is simply a smokescreen.
|
|
|
Post by LandieMark on Oct 3, 2017 9:30:28 GMT
Some, possibly. The sabs around here like to disrupt our local drag hunt for no good reason whatsoever. They are nothing more than thugs dressed in hoodies and ski masks trying to pull people off horses etc. Whilst most hunt sabs seem to be just that there is plenty of thuggish behaviour from the hunts and their supporters too. This claim of drag hunting is, generally, bullshit as well. There are ways the hunts make it appear that they are acting legally but when you look closer it is simply a smokescreen. I would counter that any thuggish behaviour from hunts is reactive rather than initial aggression. Drag hunting is generally bullshit? Sorry, but that is bollocks. If that were true then the RSPCA’s private prosecutions would have been a lot more successful. I imagine the reason the CPS don’t want anything to do with hunt prosecutions is that there is no real evidence of illegal activity. I am sure illegal hunting does go on, but that it is the exception rather than the rule. I would imagine the the police have better things to do as well.
|
|
|
Post by Bob Sacamano v2.0 on Oct 3, 2017 9:59:21 GMT
Whilst most hunt sabs seem to be just that there is plenty of thuggish behaviour from the hunts and their supporters too. This claim of drag hunting is, generally, bullshit as well. There are ways the hunts make it appear that they are acting legally but when you look closer it is simply a smokescreen. I would counter that any thuggish behaviour from hunts is reactive rather than initial aggression. Drag hunting is generally bullshit? Sorry, but that is bollocks. If that were true then the RSPCA’s private prosecutions would have been a lot more successful. I imagine the reason the CPS don’t want anything to do with hunt prosecutions is that there is no real evidence of illegal activity. I am sure illegal hunting does go on, but that it is the exception rather than the rule. I would imagine the the police have better things to do as well. Certainly up our way the "drag hunts" are thinly-veiled real hunts. To be honest they don't really try to hide the fact. As you say the police have better things to do and turn a blind eye. Prosecutions are notoriously difficult as the drag hunts usually encounter a fox by "accident" and then all bets are off.
|
|
|
Post by racingteatray on Oct 3, 2017 10:14:50 GMT
I imagine they do encounter them by accident. Hard not to not galumph around the countryside for a couple of hours with a pack of hounds bred over centuries to sniff out foxes and not actually encounter a fox. There are no shortage of them.
There were three great fat bastard foxes yickering (it was an odd noise for which that is the best description I can come up with) in our back drive about 10pm last night until I chased after them chucking gravel. I've actually had to move the car because the ripping of the cover was getting worse - I've no idea why for 10 months, it was fine with no rips, just muddy footprints and now suddenly I'm getting ripping. A heavier fox with bigger claws perhaps. Fortunately our neighbours are away for a couple of weeks so I've been able to park the car away from the wall in the turning area and maybe that'll wean them off the habit for the time being.
|
|
|
Post by Tim on Oct 3, 2017 10:31:46 GMT
My Dad has a story from the late 70s about a hunt - he was travelling down the A68 north of Corbridge and on the section where you have a sequence of fairly extreme up and down bits he came across one of the blind brows to discover a full hunt crossing just after the summit. He had been 'making progress' (as much as you could in a Maxi 1750) and was never sure how he managed to miss everything but reckoned he left a scattered hunt in his wake!
|
|